|
Forum of
publication not known
S&T POLICY
AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS: A
PERSPECTIVE
By
M.L. Sondhi
Abstract
This paper
attempts to explore the role of policy studies in general
and S&T policy in particular, towards evolving a new
approach for India’s international relations in general, and
negotiations, conflict resolution, peace and disarmament in
particular.
Introduction
Indian
policy makers have recognized the dual role of S&T in
developmental policy and planning long ago, and have defined
the scope of science policy in the following terms: science
for policy and policy for science. Thus, a scientific
approach to developmental policy and planning is considered
as important as having a policy for science. From this
perspective, policy analysts in general and S&T policy
analysts in particular have a crucial role to play in all
aspects of national development, including international
relations. This is especially true in the era of
liberalization and globalization, where the so-called
“global regimes” of international relations increasingly
determine domestic economic policies (rather than vice
versa), which in turn have a strong bearing on science,
technology and developmental policies. Conversely, domestic
compulsions to preserve the nationalist elements of
developmental policies restrict the maneuverability of the
Indian approach to international relations. These pose not
only political challenges, but also tremendous intellectual
challenges for scientists and social scientists alike.
Negotiations:
Nationalist
approaches to international negotiations are becoming
increasingly difficult and information dependent for
developing countries like India. This is much more true for
multilateral negotiations than bi-lateral negotiations.
With multilateral treaties such as GATT-WTO, climate change
convention, convention on biological diversity, CTBT, NPT
etc., becoming the order of the day, innovative approaches
to articulate nationalistic positions in these negotiations
demand an inter-sectoral coordination, not only between the
relevant ministries, but also between scientists, social
scientists, policy analysts and experts in international
relations. This offers tremendous scope for
interdisciplinary research to identify the possible policy
options and negotiating instruments as well as for lobbying
and networking with pro-India or pro-Third World
intellectuals and NGOs in the partnering countries. In the
long run, it is possible to envisage a situation where
India’s best options in various international negotiations
will be determined by a research-based intellectual
consensus rather than political exigencies. This is
especially relevant in the current era of minority
governments and coalition governments.
Conflict
Resolution:
The above
approach to international relations in general and
negotiations in particular offers a tremendous scope for
generating the relevant knowledge base as well as
identifying the right platforms and approaches for conflict
resolution. Again, networking with intellectuals and NGOs
for consensus building among the negotiating countries is an
effective tool for conflict resolution, which can only come
through establishing a common, research-based agenda.
Peace and
Disarmament
With the
increasing use of S&T for destructive purposes especially
since the second world war, scientists and intellectuals
across the world have been strongly advocating peace and
disarmament. Indian policy experts need to network with
them and build effective platforms of interaction to
articulate the Third World perspective in general and
India’s position in particular on peace and disarmament.
This not only opens up possibilities for redefining the
agenda for negotiations, but also provide policy inputs for
national governments. |
|