SEMINAR ON
THE CONCEPT OF ENTREPRENEUR
Inaugural
Suggestions
By
Professor
M.L. Sondhi
Jawaharlal
Nehru University, Delhi
The dramatic
political events during 1977 have created an expectation of
major macro-structural changes which could lay the
groundwork of a humane and egalitarian society. The
rededication of the Indian nation to democratic forms and
methods cannot by itself lead to new social formations
unless passivity and ambiguity about existing contradictions
and malign conflicts in Indian society are removed through
courageous development of social thought. It would not be
wrong to assert that the electoral choice has necessarily
been “negative” in nature. Demands for change made by the
Indian public can only be translated if “new” principles are
infused into the conduct of public life. The provision of
new guidelines for attaining popular objectives can only
come about through a revitalisation of the intellectual role
in national life.
My
chief objective in making this introductory statement is to
draw attention to some theoretical aspect which has been
elaborated by scholars working on Peace and Conflict
Theories. Peace Research has a limited validity and
usefulness and many of its results are commonplace, but I
think it would be fair to claim that it has taken the lead
in outlining suggestions for overcoming the barriers which
divide social scientists. This seminar on the Concept of
the Entrepreneur organised by a Department of Philosophy is
in full conformity with the necessities of bridge-building
between different academic disciplines for advancing ideas
for progressive social change. A narrow minded or dogmatic
approach turns an academic into a protagonist of
conservative interests. At this crucial moment when moral
and political attitudes are undergoing transformation in
India and are the focus of world attention, the Philosopher
can adapt modes of social thought to prevent distortion of
judgements in polemical confrontations. The probing of the
practical problems of entrepreneurial activity can be
related in a philosophical environment to underlying values
and assumptions guiding the humane commitments of Indian
civilisation.
A
Peace Theory applied to The Concept of the Entrepreneur
would seek to achieve several purposes.
First, it would endeavour to provide an enquiry into the
“real costs” of entrepreneurial activity. There is
difficulty with all generalisations but if we have to weigh
in the balance entrepreneurial activity it must be related
to the creative development of the social system. The
question: What constitutes social cost? is basic to any
scientific discussion.
A
second purpose, which merits attention, is the dimension of
“power and responsibility”. Much of the resistance to
change in India comes from those who adhere to immature
ideas about complex social problems which arise from the
divorce of power and responsibility.
A
third purpose should be to expose the weakness of arguments
which blame “individuals” but do not comprehend the harmful
results of modes of thought and categories which retard
social innovation.
A
fourth purpose and perhaps the most important one would be
to avoid simplistic theories which undermine faith in human
intelligence. In a letter to me, Professor Eugen Loebl
author of Humanomics speaks of a way of promoting new
scientific thinking in Economics which I would crave the
indulgence of this Seminar to quote:
“In
my opinion, economy is a system of thinking human beings and
not a system governed by laws, as both Marxists and
non-Marxist economists assume. Consequently, we must run
the economy or formulate economic theories fully respecting
the cultural continuum. I would very much object to certain
recommendations (derived from Western type economy) being
simply applied to India. That would be a catastrophe”.
I am sanguine that this seminar held in the city
of Poona renowned in our country for its sober and dedicated
scholars will approach the subject of enquiry without
routine polemics and will thereby set an example to the
academic communities in other parts of India to discharge
their social responsibility of helping the erosion of vested
interests and privileges through creative social thinking.
|