|
Seminar organised by the MLSIAPA and Jawaharlal Nehru
University
16th November 2007
New Delhi
Prof. Varun Sahni
Prof. Sahni opening up the theoretical debate on borders
said that borders constitute very unusual entities. More
importantly, India has not used history in identifying the
borders. In that sense, India is pre-modern.
Prof. k. warikoo
Prof. Warikoo talking on Himalayan borders said that there
exists an Indian cultural influence on the Indo-Himalayan
region. The merging borders of China, India, Pakistan and
Tibet in the Himalayas have lent a unique character to the
Himalayan region. Independent India however lost sight of
all this cultural heritage.
devika sharma
Borders are still relevant in contemporary international
politics because nations continue to demand territorial
states, because territorial conflicts remain protracted in
nature and moreover because globalisation and its related
processes are still rooted in a fixed territory. Terrorism
is creating different kind of borders altogether. In terms
of theorising the borders, we can see that borders are not
only politico-military in nature they are also cultural and
metaphysical. This constructivist reading of border allows
us to search for change in international politics. This is
because realism sees borders in a static manner and liberal-institutionalists
do not look at border as such even though they envision
co-operation across borders. In case of India, the
independence brought with it what can be called as
‘cartographic anxiety’. The horrors of partition, the
challenge of nation-building led to a conceptualisation of a
border forever under threat from enemies within and
without.
Dr. Swaran Singh
Discussing the changing dynamics of border negotiations
between India and China, Dr. Singh said that Himalayas are
the youngest mountains where most of the territory itself is
largely inhospitable. This implies that there are no
histories, no habitation and no folklore. Both India and
China inherited their history of territoriality from the
Europeans. However in the changed times, India and China can
make their Line of Actual Control as international border.
Borders are becoming irrelevant for the states who are
increasingly becoming self-confident about their ability to
manage things.
Dr. D. Suba Chandran
India’s boundary with Pakistan from Gujarat to Siachen
covers every known geographical feature. What is important
to remember is that the legal aspect of traffic movement
across the border is miniscule when compared to the illegal
aspect. India’s policy has been to maintain the status quo
and make the borders soft by way of starting the new bus
service, railway lines etc. Interestingly two views prevail
within the government over this issue- while the Prime
Minister’s Office and the Ministry of External Affairs want
to move forward, the Ministry of Home Affairs and Ministry
of Defence want to take things slowly. Also, the lack of
coordination between the security agencies managing the
areas on the border makes matters difficult. Yet, time has
come now for India to make the borders irrelevant.
Prof. P.R. Chari
It is difficult to imagine a region where border disputes
have been resolved except Europe. At a conceptual level, the
Sino-Indian border disputes come about because of historical
realities. Whereas, India-Pakistan dispute arises out of
partition. |